Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Dennis v. Pazen, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUZY DENNIS
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL PAZEN, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, CITY OF ARVADA, CITY OF GOLDEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wieber v. Porter, et al
as 23-1158
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE DEAN WIEBER
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW PORTER, DANIEL HYDE, JAMES L. BARRON and others
Dennis v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Suzy Dennis
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Paul Pazen, Jefferson County Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ullerich v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2021cv02954
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Ullerich
Defendant:
Jefferson County, City of Aurora, City of Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wieber v. Porter et al
as 1:2018cv02540
Defendant:
Joseph Harvey, Matthew Porter, James L. Barron and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Dean Wieber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutson v. State of Colorado, et al
as 16-1062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCKY LEE: HUTSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, CYNTHIA H. COFFMAN, Colorado States Attorney General and others
Hutson v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2015cv02336
Plaintiff:
Rocky-Lee: Hutson
Defendant:
State of Colorado, John Hickenlooper, Cynthia H. Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Arcaro v. City of Anoka, et al
as 15-1846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ashley Arcaro, also known as Ashley Trainer
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Anoka, City of Brooklyn Park, City of Clarkfield and others
Sapp v. City of Baudette et al
as 0:2015cv01589
Plaintiff:
Richard Sapp
Defendant:
City of Baudette , City of Big Lake , City of Brooklyn Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
