Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Iverson et al v. Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock Arkansas et al
as 4:2015cv00694
Plaintiff:
Bonita Iverson and April Eans
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock Arkansas and Rodney Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Chris Erwin, et al v. David Hudson
as 15-3118
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Chris Erwin and T. Blake Mitchell
Defendant - Appellant:
David Hudson, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer in and for the City of Little Rock, Arkansas
Defendant:
Stuart Thomas, Chief of Police, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the Little Rock Police Department, City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Ferneau, LLC and others
Glover v. Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv00644
Plaintiff:
Brenda Glover
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the City of Little Rock Arkansas and Rodney Forte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marilyn Norwood v. Little Rock Police Department
as 11-1961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marilyn McCoy Norwood
Defendant - Appellee:
Little Rock Police Department, City of Little Rock, Arkansas
Eddy Harris, Sr. v. City of Little Rock
as 10-3428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddy S. Harris, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Little Rock, Arkansas
Robert Storay v. City of Little Rock, et al
as 10-3165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert J. Storay
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Little Rock, Arkansas (originally sued as Little Rock Police Department), Chad O'Kelly, Officer, Little Rock Police Department, Spencer Smith, Officer, Little Rock Police Department and others
Eddy Harris, Sr. v. City of Little Rock, et al
as 08-3715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddy S. Harris, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Little Rock, Arkansas, Lawrence Johnson, Chief of Police of Little Rock, Arkansas, Ronnie Smith, Detective of the Police Department of Little Rock, Arkansas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
