Cases 1 - 10 of 79
MATHIS et al v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
W. MATHIS and K. DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Oliver v. River City Process Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
River City Process Service, Inc., By The Book Attorney Service, Inc., Advanced Attorney Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Quinn v. United States Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv02254
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
United States Department of Health & Human Services, Boost Mobile, United States Attorney's Office for District of Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tutankhaman v. Lewis et al
as 2:2022cv01865
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman
Defendant:
Nigel Lewis, Tamara Tolbert, Christopher Reed and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McKenzie v. McKenzie
as 4:2021cv00926
Plaintiff:
Lewis Brooks McKenzie
Defendant:
Kelli Marie McKenzie, Dawn King, Kelly Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant:
Brookfield Properties, LLC, John De Foor, II, Robert McBurney and others
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
McCann, Derrick v. Dane County Court Services
as 3:2019cv00989
Defendant:
Dane County Court Services
Plaintiff:
Derrick McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
