Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Jasmol Singh et al v. Heja Rosebiani et al
as 2:2023cv05115
Plaintiff:
Jasmol Singh and Umit Bagga
Defendant:
DEA Special Agent Heja Rosebiani, DEA Special Agent Mark Carroll, CHP Officer Jay Sides and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Schembri v. FBI Headquarters et al
as 2:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kimberley A. Schembri
Defendant:
FBI Headquarters, US Marshals Headquarters, DEA Drug Enforcement Administrative and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heizelman v. San Diego Police Dept et al
as 3:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
Robert Heizelman
Defendant:
San Diego Police Dept, Sheriffs Office, DEA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Epperson v. United States, et al.
as 1:2022cv00855
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
United States, FBI, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arsen Manson v. The United States et al
as 2:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
Arsen Manson
Defendant:
The United States, Kamala D. Harris, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01532
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Milagros Clarke v. FBI et al
as 2:2018cv08421
Defendant:
DEA, -, Google Associate, AT and T and others
Plaintiff:
Milagros Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amery Gaspard et al v. DEA Task Force et al
as 5:2016cv02290
Defendant:
Det Bennett, Officer Campos, Ernest Lee Cartwright and others
Plaintiff:
Amery Gaspard and Yvonne Hrindich
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
