Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv06518
Defendant:
Perfecting Faith Church, Carly Bass, Nathan Lee Both Plumbers and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv04915
Defendant:
Darren T. Moore, Nathan Lee, JP Morgan Chase Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cossette et al v. County of Oneida et al
as 6:2023cv01587
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Cossette, Darren Humble, Donna Marano and others
Defendant:
County of Oneida and Anthony R. Carvelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Howard v. City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06561
Plaintiff:
Darius Howard
Defendant:
City of Rochester, Jonathan Laureano, County of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
