Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Bessent v. Biden, et al
as 8:2022cv01865
Petitioner:
Rashad D. Bessent
Defendant:
Nadia K. Daughtrey, Elizabeth M. Warren, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bessent v. Biden et al
as 2:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Rashad-Devon Bessent
Defendant:
Joseph Roinette Biden, Jr., Charles Rettig, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bey v. Hall et al
as 2:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Asad Zay Bey
Defendant:
Don T. Hall, Larry L. Eger, Nadia K. Daughtrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Fite et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Emmaunel Benjoassaint, Wislene Casir and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Fite, Sarah B. Akins, Hon. J. Antonio DelCampo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B& G Opa Holdings, Inc. et al v. Daughtrey et al
as 1:2018cv23269
Defendant:
City of Opa Locka, Florida and Newall J Daughtrey
Plaintiff:
B& G Opa Holdings, Inc. and B & G Opa Land Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fernanders v. Daughtrey et al
as 4:2016cv10262
Plaintiff:
Anderson Lee Fernanders
Defendant:
Martha Craig Daughtrey, Raymond M. Kethledge and Peter C. Economus
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hudson
Defendant:
Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
Daughtrey v. Fresno City Police Department, et al.
as 1:2007cv00722
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dale Daughtrey
Defendant:
Fresno City Police Department and Pat Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
