Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hicks v. Walgreens et al
as 3:2023cv50031
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant:
Walgreens, Rockford Police Department and State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. People Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50032
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant:
People Of The State Of Illinois, Blackhawk Area Tasc Force, Illinois State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv50451
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dean Hicks
Defendant:
United States, Social Security, Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meacham v. University Of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv04961
Plaintiff:
Rose Meachum and Rose Meacham
Defendant:
University Of Illinois, State of Illinois, Illinois State Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
West v. Kusch, et al
as 1:2021cv06710
Plaintiff:
Dean West
Defendant:
John M. Kusch, Nazneen Hospitality Inc and Nazneen Saiyed doing business as Abode Motel
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pike v. Rettig et al
as 3:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Rashan Markell Pike
Defendant:
Charles Rettig, Unknown, Timothy Gribblen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
