Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Caraffa v. Ehrbright et al
as 2:2019cv05136
Defendant:
Phoenix Prosecutor's Office, Quicken Loans Incorporated, Downtown Phoenix Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred E Caraffa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dishon v. Urness et al
as 2:2019cv01131
Defendant:
Carol Hirschberg-James, Amy Urness, Caroline Dishon and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Dishon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Holmes v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2009cv08156
Plaintiff:
Dementre Holmes
Defendant:
Flagstaff, City of, Flagstaff Unified School District, CPS of Flagstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00701
Plaintiff:
John Steven Simon
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, City of, Maricopa County Special Health Care District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bolton v. Bolton et al
as 2:2008cv01319
Plaintiff:
Rhonna Bolton
Defendant:
Robert Bolton, A-Z Defendants and ABC Corporations
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jensen et al v. Douglas et al
as 3:2007cv08119
Plaintiff:
Kendel Vance Jensen and Amber Jensen
Defendant:
Kelley Douglas, Donna Goodman, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Maricopa County Public Defender's Office
as 2:2007cv01404
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dean Jackson
Defendant:
Maricopa County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Prusha et al v. Bell et al
as 2:2007cv01182
Plaintiff:
Virginia Prusha and John Prusha
Defendant:
Richard Bell, Does, Roes Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
