Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Shahid v. South African Airways et al
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Kesha M. Shahid
Defendant:
South African Airways, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Boomer v. Novak et al
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
Bobby Boomer
Defendant:
R. Novak, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pendelton v. Miyares et al
as 1:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pendleton
Defendant:
Jason Miyares, Louise DiMatteo, Commissioners of Virginia Deparment of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Sealed Plaintiff 1 et al v. Front et al
as 3:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Sealed Plaintiff 1 and others
Defendant:
Patriot Front, Thomas Rousseau, Paul Gancarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Smith v. Doe et al
as 7:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Smith
Defendant:
John Doe, John Does 2-8, Howard B. Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stout et al v. Ofc. Barrow et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stout and Marc Stout
Defendant:
Ofc. Barrow, Ofc. Murphy, Ofc. Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menders et al v Loudoun County School Board
as 1:2021cv00669
Plaintiff:
Scott Mineo, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cash v. Wilson et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, Michael L Brown, John Roe, 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Cash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baby L., et al v Esper, et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Michael Pompeo, Donna Welton, Doe Defendants 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Doe 1, Doe 2 and "Baby L."
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
