Cases 1 - 10 of 22
TALBERT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv04374
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, E. BROWN, D. T. THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. DUNKIN et al
as 2:2017cv04375
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
G. DUNKIN, H. ANDERSON and E. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDONALD-WITHERSPOON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01914
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCDONALD-WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHILADELPHIA ADULT PAROLE AND PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Cross_claimant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC.
Cross_defendant:
MHM SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOVIHO v. LANCASTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2015cv03151
Plaintiff:
MAWUYRAYRASSUNA EMMANUEL NOVIHO
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA , SCOTT F. MARTIN , TODD E. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. IKEA PROPERTY, INC.
as 2:2014cv01713
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
IKEA PROPERTY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BROWN v. MARIA ASSOCIATES
as 2:2014cv01712
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
MARIA ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. WP PLAZA POINTE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
as 2:2014cv01714
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
WP PLAZA POINTE ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. ROBINSON MALL, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01715
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
ROBINSON MALL, INC., J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INC and SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BROWN v. WHITEMAK ASSOCIATES
as 5:2012cv00978
Defendant:
WHITEMAK ASSOCIATES
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BROWN v. REID PANY MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 5:2011cv07130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN
Defendant:
REID PANY MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
