Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt v. Internal Revenue Services et al
as 2:2024cv01775
Defendant:
Gary Sinise, Internal Revenue Services, California Victim Compensation Board and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Patrick Eastman et al v. Chino Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
William Patrick Eastman
Defendant:
Chino Police Department and Officer Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Lax v. Abode Services et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lax and Dominique Lax
Defendant:
Abode Services, Life moves opportunity center, Brandon with Bill Wilson Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eastman et al v. State Bar of California
as 5:2020cv09517
Plaintiff:
Darren Eastman
Defendant:
State Bar of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01645
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Robert Logsdon, Ben Green and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Fitzgerald v. City of Anaheim CA et al
as 8:2016cv02182
Defendant:
City of Anaheim CA, DOES, Gail Eastman and others
Plaintiff:
William D Fitzgerald
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Building Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016at00605
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Building Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
