Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Santoyo v. Bexar Cty
as 19-50124
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL BIBLE, United States Immigration and Enforcement, KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Julio Santoyo v. Bexar County, Texas, et al
as 17-51005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIO TRUJILLO SANTOYO
Defendant - Appellee:
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS, ENRIQUE M. LUCERO, Field Office Director for the San Antonio Field Office, JOHN DOE 1-5, Employees of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Julio Trujillo Santoyo v. Bexar County, Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00855
Defendant:
Bexar County, Texas, John Doe 1-5 and Enrique M. Lucero
Plaintiff:
Julio Trujillo Santoyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Kerry et al
as 7:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Garza
Defendant:
John Kerry, Wilfredo Garcia, Julio Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Luna Luna v. Rodriguez
as 7:2014cv00788
Plaintiff:
Juan Luna Luna
Defendant:
Francisco Rodriguez, Jorge Cruz, Rolando Cruz, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meza Vidauri v. Bruno
as 7:2014cv00768
Plaintiff:
Antonio Meza Vidauri
Defendant:
Bruno Garza, Jr., G. Martinez, Enrique M. Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Garcia et al
as 7:2014cv00794
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Garza Garza
Respondent:
Wilfredo Garcia
Defendant:
Julio Trujillo, Enrique M. Lucero, John Kerry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza v. Garcia et al
as 4:2014cv02445
Defendant:
Guadalupe Garza Garza , Wilfredo Garcia, Julio Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolentino v.Lucero et al
as 7:2014cv00752
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Dominguez Tolentino
Defendant:
Enrique M Lucero, John Kerry, Jeh Charles Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
