Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Sudano et al v. City of Folly Beach, The et al
as 2:2022cv02895
Plaintiff:
Ty Sudano and Thomas Easterling
Defendant:
City of Folly Beach, The, Timothy Goodwin, Franklin Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
A.M.L. et al v. Wright Directions, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv01874
Plaintiff:
A.M.L., J.J.L., E.R.L. and others
Defendant:
Wright Directions, LLC, Renee Sutton, LPC, Nikki Nichols, LPC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Cherry et al
as 0:2020cv03489
Defendant:
Pastor Ron Carpenter, Bishop Claude Alexander Jr, Prophet Rick Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Janice McMullen Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1982
Jordan v. Jordan et al
as 3:2020cv03133
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jordan
Defendant:
Franklin Jordan and Evelyn Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jordan v. Jordan et al
as 3:2019cv02561
Defendant:
Franklin ODell Jordan and Evelyn Nates Jordan
Plaintiff:
Sarah Diana Jordan, Diana Biernaski Jordan and SDJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jordan v. Jordan et al
as 3:2018cv02925
Plaintiff:
Diana Jordan
Defendant:
Franklin Jordan and Evelyn Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bird et al v. Chesterfield County et al
as 4:2017cv03474
Plaintiff:
Randall Bird and Eagle Construction and Contracting LLC
Defendant:
Chesterfield County, Dennis R Douglas, James McGonagall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
