Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gamada Hussein v. M Health Fairview, et al
as 22-3527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
M Health Fairview, Fridley Police Department, Rochester Minnesota Police Department and others
Gamada Hussein v. Walmart Inc., et al
as 22-3507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart, Inc., U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Bank, Neosho Branch and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02469
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Hussein v. Office of Inspector General Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 0:2019cv02058
Defendant:
John Does, Central Intelligence Agency Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer and Office of Inspector General Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
Gamada A. Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hussein v. Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01913
Defendant:
Minnesota and John Does
Plaintiff:
Gamada A. Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hussein v. President Donald J. Trump et al
as 0:2019cv01718
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump and John Does
Plaintiff:
Gamada A. Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hussein v. Whitaker et al
as 0:2019cv00292
Defendant:
John Does, U.S. Department of Justice, Matthew G. Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Gamada A. Hussein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Gamada Hussein v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, et al
as 17-2513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant - Appellee:
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Christopher Wray, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
