Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. Lowe et al
as 5:2018cv05186
Defendant:
Mike Dunlap, Rick Esser, Johnny Akers and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Garrett and Shirley D. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. The State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2018cv05128
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M. Garrett
Defendant:
Curtis DeLapp, Nowata County, Rick Esser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuff et al v. Bentonville School District et al
as 5:2010cv05063
Plaintiff:
Mike Acuff and Kristy Acuff
Defendant:
Bentonville School District, Gary Compton, Kim Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Haney et al v. Arkansas Automobile Dealers' Association et al
as 4:2010cv04003
Plaintiff:
Linda Haney, Margaret Smith, Beulah Skiver and others
Defendant:
Arkansas Automobile Dealers' Association, TRW Target Marketing and Recall Center, The
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Driver Privacy Protection Act
Zamarron et al v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas, City of et al
as 5:2008cv05166
Plaintiff:
Nancy Zamarron, Kevin Capps, Libby Lusk and others
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, City of, Joe Garrett, Jerry Toler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
