Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Harris v. Michigan Department of Civil Rights et al
as 2:2023cv13082
Plaintiff:
John Isaac Harris
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Civil Rights, Lori Vinson, Cari Cooper and others
Gardner v. Timber Ridge Wyoming Apartments LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ashley Gardner
Defendant:
Timber Ridge Wyoming Apartments LLC, Sterling Management LTD Inc, Mindy Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker v. Walker et al
as 1:2023cv00489
Plaintiff:
Wayne Walker
Defendant:
William Walker, Jeff Sorensen, Jack Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Waugh v. Oakland, County of et al
as 2:2023cv10025
Plaintiff:
Krystle Symone Waugh
Defendant:
Oakland County, Jason Miller, Carl Sorensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Young v. Battle Creek, City of et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Young Derek and Derek Young
Defendant:
City of Battle Creek, Garrett Day, Robert Henley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cooper-Keel v. Keel-Worrell
as 1:2022cv01236
Plaintiff:
Nevin P. Cooper-Keel
Defendant:
Garrett Keel-Worrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace et al
as 1:2022cv12540
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
Buckingham Palace, Prince William, Prince Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorezo v. Buckingham Palace et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
Garrett MJ Talif Sorezo
Defendant:
Buckingham Palace, Prince William, Prince Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Conyers v. Garrett
as 2:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Monica Conyers
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
