Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017cv03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al Do not docket in this case. See new case number 5:17-ct-3192-BO.
as 7:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al
as 5:2017ct03192
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry , Paul Hardison , Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Henry et al CASE OPENED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE CORRECT CASE 5:17-CT-3192-BO.
as 7:2017ct00153
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Charles Henry, Paul Hardison, Hans Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Groom, et al
as 7:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Michael Groom , City of Jacksonville, N.C. , Christopher Capps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al -
as 7:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Onslow County, N.C., et al
as 5:2016ct03267
Plaintiff:
George R. Evans
Defendant:
Onslow County, N.C. , Hans Miller and Detention Officer Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
EVANS V. GRIFFIN, ET AL
as 1:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS
Defendant:
J.K. GRIFFIN and CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Evans v. Griess et al
as 7:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Defendant:
Jason Griess, Funcke, Ehrler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVANS v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER ET AL
as 1:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
GEORGE REYNOLD EVANS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, B.J. BARNES, LANIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
