Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Marc Stephens, et al v. William Martini, et al
as 22-3384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARC A. STEPHENS and TYRONE K. STEPHENS
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM J. MARTINI, of the District Court in Newark, JUDGE ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, JUDGE L. FELIPE RESTREPO, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GURBIR S. GREWAL, Attorney General, States of New Jersey, Individually and in official capacity
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
CONFORTI v. HANLON et al
as 3:2020cv08267
Defendant:
SCOTT M. COLABELLA, CHRISTINE GIORDANO HANLON, PAULA SOLLAMI COVELLO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE CONFORTI, ARATI KREIBICH, KEVIN MCMILLAN and others
Amicus Curiae:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NEW JERSEY and Salvation and Social Justice
Intervenor:
OFFICE OF THE BERGEN COUTY CLERK, GURBIR S GREWAL, HONORABLE JAMES HOGAN and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Middlesex County Democratic Organization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FELD et al v. THE CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv12428
Defendant:
JOSEPH N. DIVINCENZO, JR., WEEQUAHIC PRESERVATION LLC, DANIELLE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
EPSTIEN HARDWARE CO., REASONABLE LOCK & SAFE CO., THE FOUR FELDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
John Reardon v. Phil Murphy, et al
as 22-1858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, ATTORNEY GENERAL GURBIR S. GREWAL, B. SUE FULTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE GEORGE SINGLEY, JUDGE JOHN MORRELLI, PROSECUTOR DANIEL LONG and others
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Defendant:
JUDGE LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
STEPHENS v. GREWAL et al
as 1:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
MARC A. STEPHENS
Defendant:
GURBIR S. GREWAL, ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STOCKTON UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS et al v. MARTINI et al
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
MARC STEPHENS and TYRONE STEPHENS
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM J. MARTINI, JUDGE ANTHONY JOSEPH SCIRICA, JUDGE LUIS FELIPE RESTREPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS et al v. MARTINI et al
as 1:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
MARC STEPHENS and TYRONE STEPHENS
Defendant:
JUDGE WILLIAM J. MARTINI, JUDGE ANTHONY JOSEPH SCIRICA, JUDGE LUIS FELIPE RESTREPO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giovanni Lopresti, et al v. Carole A. Johnson, et al
as 22-1435
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GIOVANNI LOPRESTI and NINO CALABRESE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARNADO PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CAROLE JOHNSON, in her official capacity as Commissioner and within the scope of the Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Office of Child Support Services, NATASHA JOHNSON, in her Official capacity as Director and Assistant Commissioner and within the scope of her authority and office of the Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development, Officeof Child Support Services and GURBIR S. GREWAL, In his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of New Jersey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
