Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Harris et al v. Wayne et al
as 2:2023cv10986
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris, Blanca Arguelles, Amber Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Officer Terri Graham and Terri Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rideout v. Shelby Township et al
as 2:2022cv11597
Plaintiff:
Willie Rideout
Defendant:
Shelby Township, Shelby Township Police Department, Robert Shelide and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hogan v. Hanft et al
as 1:2021cv12683
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hogan
Defendant:
Howie S. Hanft, Ogemaw County Board of Commissioners, winter, corrections officer and others
KELMENDI et al v. HOGAN
as 2:2020cv12354
Plaintiff:
JOHN KELMENDI and TOM DJONOVIC
Defendant:
T. HOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zawada v. Hogan et al
as 3:2019cv12103
Defendant:
Hamburg, Township of, Sergeant Megan Paul, Police Officer Patrick Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Artur Zawada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. H.W. Kaufman Financial Group, Inc., a Michigan corporation
as 2:2018cv10997
Plaintiff:
Diarmuid Hogan
Defendant:
H.W. Kaufman Financial Group, Inc., a Michigan corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Barber v. Currier et al
as 2:2016cv11472
Plaintiff:
Dexter Dean Barber
Defendant:
Janelle Currier, Isabella Jenkins, Carol Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber #170311 v. Currier et al
as 1:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Dexter Dean Barber #170311
Defendant:
Janelle Currier, Isabella Jenkins, Carol Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights: Employment
Cannon v. Wayne County Probate Court et al
as 2:2012cv10652
Plaintiff:
Ronald Cannon
Defendant:
Wayne County Probate Court, Charlene Glover-Hogan and Imir Iqbal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
