Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
OBUZOR v. CLAYTON et al
as 2:2023cv01488
Plaintiff:
JOANNA OBUZOR
Defendant:
JESSE CLAYTON, ROSS KENNEDY, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
SHEILA HARPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
HORTON et al v. RANGOS et al
as 2:2022cv01391
Plaintiff:
DION HORTON, DAMON JONES, CRAIG BROWNLEE and others
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE JILL RANGOS, FRANK SCHERER, ANTHONY MARIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUCEK v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
DOLORES M. BUCEK
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ORLANDO L. HARPER and LAURA WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARPER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
KENYA HARPER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, DR. FNU ANDERSON, NURSE FNU LNU 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
