Cases 1 - 10 of 30
HODGES v. BURKHART
as 1:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JESSIE HODGES
Defendant:
NATHAN BURKHART and ERIE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
HICKS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
TERMAINE JOSEPH HICKS and TERMAINE HICKS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARTIN VINSON, ROBERT ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HODGE v. CITY OF UNIONTOWN et al
as 2:2021cv01924
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE HODGE
Defendant:
CITY OF UNIONTOWN, MARTIN GATTI, KIMBERLY MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
N.H. et al v. WILKINS TOWNSHIP
as 2:2020cv01872
Defendant:
WILKINS TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
MERI KAY HODGES, N.H. and SHARON HODGES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HODGES et al v. BRASIL et al
as 2:2020cv04086
Plaintiff:
TERRAINE HODGES and KASHIEF MC MILLAN
Defendant:
JAY LEVENSTEIN, JIM BRASIL and CHRISTOPHER BREITFELLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGE v. CITY OF UNIONTOWN et al
as 2:2020cv00025
Defendant:
CITY OF UNIONTOWN, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S), MARTIN GATTI and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HODGE v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2019cv05414
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, AMNA IFTIKHAR, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
SELENA HODGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hodges v. Rufus et al
as 3:2018cv01528
Defendant:
Child Youth Service, Freddie Rufus, Scranton Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Child Youth Family Service Luzerne et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
Yaisha Hodges
Defendant:
Child Youth Family Service Luzerne, Aaron McCurdy and Freddie Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
