Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith, et al v. Reynolds County, Missouri et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Tom Stout, Cody Newman, Reynolds County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
I. S., Maud Smith and E. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Robison v. Department of Insurance, Finanical Institutions and Professional Registration et al
as 4:2018cv01527
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Chlora Lindley-Myers, John F. Rehagen and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Travis Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Joplin School District et al
as 3:2018cv05054
Plaintiff:
William Turner
Defendant:
Joplin School District , C.J. Huff, Bud Sexson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The Gaming Company DBA Argosy Casino Hotel and Spa et al
as 5:2016cv06167
Plaintiff:
Keith Williams
Defendant:
The Gaming Company , Missouri Gaming Commission , B.K. Huff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Huff et al
as 3:2015cv05052
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , Doechild I and Doechild II
Defendant:
C. J. Huff and Brandon Eggleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Louis Effort for AIDS, et al v. Huff
as 2:2013cv04246
Plaintiff:
St. Louis Effort For AIDS , Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri , Consumers Council of Missouri and others
Defendant:
John M. Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tucker v. Joplin R-VIII School District et al
as 3:2011cv03282
Plaintiff:
James Tucker
Defendant:
Joplin R-VIII School District, C J Huff and Mike Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Huff v. Underwood et al
as 6:2010cv03241
Defendant:
George Underwood, Tim Ward, Wendell Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Huff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
