Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Eason v. 1008 Enterprises INC et al
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Eason
Defendant:
1008 Enterprises INC doing business as Budget Inn Hotel and Rakesh Gandhi doing business as Budget Inn Hotel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Fortney v. Doe et al
as 4:2022cv00277
Defendant:
MCR Investors, LLC also known as MCR Hotels doing business as Hampton Inn of Bixby / South Tulsa, John Doe, Todd Blish and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Fortney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Akins et al v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00162
Plaintiff:
Arbrey Akins and Carissa Akins
Defendant:
Travelers Inn, Meridian Inn, Budget Inn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00120
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stevens et al v. Animal Control Officer et al
as 6:2016cv00531
Plaintiff:
Gaylord Stevens, American History Museum, Liberty and Justice Motion Pictures and others
Defendant:
Animal Control Officer, Nik Morgan, Roy Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. LQ Management, LLC et al
as 6:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
LQ Management, LLC, La Quinta Franchising, LLC, Kubur Nath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shepeard v. Royal Inn Express
as 4:2015cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jessie Shepeard
Defendant:
Royal Inn Express
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
