Cases 1 - 10 of 496
El-Hajj-Bey v. Rittenband et al
as 3:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Elijah El-Hajj-Bey
Defendant:
Richard Mayer Rittenband, J. Richard Mayer Rittneband Estate, Statewide Grievance Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Damhas et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines, Shameka Hines and Telly Hines
Defendant:
Damhas, Earl Given, 915 Lafayette Blv Room 400 06604 and others
Pal v. Tallberg et al
as 3:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Neelu Pal
Defendant:
James N Tallberg, Andrew J Glass, Patrick D Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Ware v. Calistro et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Richard Marquell Ware
Defendant:
Eugene Calistro, Joseph Fortini and Kevin J. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunbar v. City of New Haven et al
as 3:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Jerome T. Dunbar and Jerome Thomas Dunbar
Defendant:
City of New Haven, Wendy J. Mongillo and Stephen W. Whalen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nastri et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
David J. Nastri and We The Patriots USA, Inc
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Louis DeJoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hines v. Hines et al
as 3:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Shameka Hines, Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump and others
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
