Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Moore v. Knox County et al (TWP1)
as 3:2019cv00074
Defendant:
Christian Gomez, Knox County, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
The Estate of Amos Matthew Frerichs v. Knox County et al (TV3)
as 3:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Amos Matthew Frerichs
Defendant:
Knox County, J.J. Jones and Evan Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Knox County Tennessee et al (PLR1)
as 3:2015cv00485
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Nichols
Defendant:
Knox County Tennessee, J.J. Jones, Knox County Sheriff Dept. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Knox County Sheriff's Department et al (PLR2)
as 3:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Rickey A Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Knox County Sheriff's Department, J.J. Jones, Terry Branson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shirley Vineyard, et al v. Knox County, TN, et al
as 14-6452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHIRLEY VINEYARD and JAMES VINEYARD
Defendant - Appellee:
KNOX COUNTY, TN, JIMMY J.J. JONES, Sheriff of Knox County in his individual capacity. and UNKNOWN OFFICERS, with the Knox County Detention Center, in their individual capacities.
Jelsma et al v. Knox County, Tennessee et al (TV2)
as 3:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Patty Jelsma and Shane Jelsma
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee, J.J. Jones and Bradley Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vineyard et al v. Knox County et al
as 3:2013cv00634
Plaintiff:
Shirley Vineyard and James Vineyard
Defendant:
Knox County , Jimmy J.J. Jones and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Knox County, Tennessee et al (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
John Curtis Lundy
Defendant:
Knox County, Tennessee and Jimmy J.J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newby v. Sharp et al (TV1)
as 3:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
James H Newby
Defendant:
John M Sharp, James T Hammond, J Moyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
