Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LeFay et al v. LeFay et al
as 1:2013cv01362
Plaintiff:
Sharron LeFay , Jeff Wall and Scott Wall
Defendant:
William Charles LeFay, Eric Panabaker , Len Gleim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFay et al v. LeFay et al
as 1:2013at00610
Plaintiff:
Sharron LeFay , Jeff Wall and Scott Wall
Defendant:
William Charles LeFay, Eric Panabaker, Len Gleim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moran v. City of New York
as 12-4583
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Matthew Moran, Megan Cox, Michelle Borok and others
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, John and Jane Does, Police Officers 1-50, individually and in their official capacities, Shawn Allen, Police Officer and others
Archuletta v. Martinez, et al.
as 1:2012cv00732
Defendant:
Daniel Robinson, Cornelius Foxworth , Yancy Moseley and others
Plaintiff:
Juanita Archuletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis v. Fresno Police Department, et al.
as 1:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Shandra Solis
Defendant:
Fresno Police Department , City Of Fresno , David Fries and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Sellers v. Espresso Roma Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv03260
Plaintiff:
Jay L. Sellers
Defendant:
Espresso Roma Corporation, Sandra Coldiron, Josh Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Sellers v. City of Davis Police Departmen, et al
as 08-15912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY L. SELLERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DAVIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CAYCE WALLACE and others
Sellers v. City of Davis Police Department et al
as 2:2007cv02368
Plaintiff:
Jay L. Sellers
Defendant:
City of Davis Police Department, Social Security Administration, Cayce Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
