Civil Rights Cases
Hanks v. City of Syracuse
as 22-2819
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brandon Hanks, and other similarly situated individuals
Defendant / Appellee: City of Syracuse, Kenton Buckner, In his individual capacity, Deputy Chief Richard Trudell, In his individual capacity and others
Defendant: Does 1-100
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanks v. City of Syracuse et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00921
Plaintiff: Brandon Hanks
Defendant: City of Syracuse, Kenton Buckner, Deputy Chief Richard Trudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00845
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marcavage v. City of Syracuse
as 12-2638
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael Marcavage, P.O. Box 30000, Philadelphia, PA 19103 800-627-2282 and Michael Stockwell, 2 Imperial Drive, Selden, NY 11784 631-833-3067
Defendant - Appellee: Syracuse Police Department, Joseph Cecile, Deputy Chief of Police, in his official and individual capacities, Richard Shoff, Lieutenant, in his official and individual capacities and others
Marcavage et al v. City of Syracuse, New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00761
Plaintiff: Michael Marcavage and Michael Stockwell
Defendant: City of Syracuse, New York , Syracuse Police Department , Frank Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. Litchfield
as 3:2007cv00010
Plaintiff: Joseph Cecil Chaney
Defendant: Elmer Litchfield and Elmer Litchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?