Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent: Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant: Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff: Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01292
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GODFREY et al v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00138
Defendant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Plaintiff: ANTHONY GODFREY, CURTIS GODFREY, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00285
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00425
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Marshall et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00332
Plaintiff: J John Marshall and Kimberly Wiley
Estate_plaintiff: Marjorie Marshall
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank , Ameriprise Bank, Fidelity National Field Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?