Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Powell v. Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
FAWN POWELL
Defendant:
Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital doing business as MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND and MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWLAND v. JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv02359
Plaintiff:
ANDREW EVAN HOWLAND
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ENGLAND v. JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
as 4:2021cv00019
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ENGLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WOODRING v. JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
as 4:2018cv00243
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
REBECCA WOODRING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACOBS v. JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Anita Jacobs
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and CITY OF SEYMOUR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YATES v. JACKSON COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER
as 4:2016cv00048
Defendant:
IDA AUFFENBURG, TONY FLEETWOOD, SUE GANS and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ANTHONY YATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MITCHELL v. JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA et al
as 1:2014cv00457
Defendant:
CHRIS EVERHART, JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JACKSON COUNTY, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY C. MITCHELL, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
