Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Hines v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hines
Defendant:
Ofc. William Jenkins, Sgt. Christopher Dale Robinson, Ofc. Josh Adam Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JEFFERSON v. KENDALL
as 5:2023cv00350
Plaintiff:
Garrett Jefferson
Defendant:
HONORABLE FRANK KENDALL, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE and Honorable FRANK KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Kevin Brown
Defendant:
Carltez D. Jefferson, Mike Ireland, Jessica Matthews and others
West v. Webb et al
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Katherine West
Defendant:
L.A. Webb, J.L. Jefferson and W.T. Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jefferson v. The State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv01883
Plaintiff:
Sherri Jefferson
Defendant:
The State Bar of Georgia, Sharon L. Bryant, Sarah B. Coole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Thomas v. Newton County, GA et al
as 1:2021cv02049
Plaintiff:
Michel Thomas
Defendant:
Ezell Brown, Newton County, GA, Deputy Lachrenmayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2020cv00144
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JACQUILLE BROWN, WARDEN GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, LIEUTENANT JERRY L JEFFERSON and others
Plaintiff:
YAMIL TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROMARTIE v. SHEALY et al
as 7:2019cv00181
Defendant:
RANDA WHARTON, BRADFORD SHEALY and BRADFIELD SHEALY
Plaintiff:
RAY JEFFERSON CROMARTIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
