Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
FEARRON et al v. RESTUCCIA et al
as 3:2020cv14819
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, SHEILAH A. COLEY, DANIEL SIMPKINS and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN GILES and ANTHONY FEARRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HART v. HOPPER et al
as 2:2015cv05439
Plaintiff:
GARRETT E. HART
Defendant:
MARY MCFALL HOPPER, DELAWARE COUNTY DEPUTIES JOHN/JANE DOE 1-99, CITY OF CHESTER, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCants v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Harry McCants and John/Jane Does 1-99
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Monica Gonzalez-Gillespie, Martha Gimbel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kenneth Smith v. Antonin Scalia, et al
as 14-5180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John G. Roberts and others
Tony White v. Kory Shaffer, et al
as 14-35313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY KIM WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
KORY SHAFFER, Deputy, PIERCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, PIERCE COUNTY and others
White v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2013cv05952
Plaintiff:
Tony Kim White
Defendant:
Kory Shaffer , Pierce County Sheriff's Department , Pierce County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corrie v. Sweeney et al
as 1:2013cv06362
Plaintiff:
Roy Corrie
Defendant:
Rhoda Davis Sweeney, Cook County, Illinois and John/Jane Does 1-99
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
