Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cole v. Tee Grizzly et al
as 1:2019cv00607
Defendant:
David Bruce Toyota, Tee Grizzly, John Bowling and others
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn M. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2019cv01027
Plaintiff:
John Bowles
Defendant:
William Wolfe, Erick Enderle, City of San Jose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Corey Lea v. AGRI, et al
as 14-5445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, FARMERS NATIONAL BANK, BARREN RIVER HEALTH DEPARTMENT and others
Bowles v. Lemus et al
as 5:2013cv04730
Plaintiff:
John Bowles
Defendant:
Noel Lemus, Hugo Demoral , Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lea v. United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights, Tom Vilsack, Joe Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Corey Lea Inc., et al v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 11-5969
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY LEA INC. and COREY LEA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TOM VILSACK, LARRY HINTON and others
Defendant:
JOHN BOWLES and MITCH WHITTLE
Corey Lea Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 1:2010cv00029
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea Inc. and Corey Lea
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, John Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
