Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
JONES v. MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
MAINE STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES v. PORTLAND MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES
Defendant:
PORTLAND MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00383
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CARNEY et al v. HANCOCK COUNTY MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
FRANK L SHEP ARD, AROOSTOOK MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, KAYLA DUMOND and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA E WINCHELL, ESQ and STEW ART CARNEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MERRILL et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, KATHERINE JONES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PEABODY, PAULINE LAMONTAGNE, LYNN MERRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SAVAGE et al v. MILLS
as 1:2020cv00165
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY CROSBY, KARL WARD, DR JOHN HERZOG and others
Defendant:
JANET T MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAPI et al v. TOWN OF GORHAM et al
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAPI and JOHN J PAPI LLC
Defendant:
TOWN OF GORHAM, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN COUNCIL, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
