Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
CHAMBERS v. HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02216
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY AND JOHNSON FOR THE STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEWBREW, JR. v. KINCAID, II, et al
as 2:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
Mr. Herbert A Dewbrew and HERBERT A. DEWBREW, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT ALLEN KINCAID, Josh Gewirtzman, Jeremy Rasico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
KRIPPS et al v. PATTERSON et al
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
MARY ETTA KRIPPS and C. B.
Defendant:
JOSH PATTERSON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLEMAN v. PETERS et al
as 1:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
WAYDE COLEMAN
Defendant:
JOSH A PETERS, CINDY PALMER, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/MARION COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DENNY v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT DENNY
Defendant:
TYLER BOWLING and JOSH PAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. COUCH et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
CHRIS COUCH, TOM FOUST, JOSH SCHERSCHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHAMBERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
