Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Crooked Arm v. The City of Hardin et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Elery Royce Crooked Arm
Defendant:
The City of Hardin, Calen Curtin, Donald Babbin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fails v. J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A.
as 6:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
John Daniel Falls, Jr. and John Daniel Fails
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Philips v. City of Missoula Police Department et al
as 9:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Philips, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Missoula Police Department, Chief Jaeson White, Cpt. R. Stepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Porter et al v. Ringer
as 9:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
KRP and Jeffrey Craig Porter, Jr.
Defendant:
Darby Deputy Marshal John Ringer, Town of Darby, Montana, Darby Marshal Larry Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Logue v. Planned Parenthood
as 9:2019cv00118
Plaintiff:
Clarence Redmond Logue, Jr.
Defendant:
Planned Parenthood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poulson v. Bullock et al
as 9:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kermit Ty Poulson
Defendant:
Steve Bullock, Tim Fox, Stacy Boman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
BEH Gaming, Ltd. et al v. Schmockel et al
as 4:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
BEH Gaming, Ltd. , NORAM-BEH, LLC and NORAM, LLC
Defendant:
Tanya Schmockel, Caryn Sangrey, Misty Denny and others
Cause Of Action: Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
White Eagle-Payne v. Bemer et al
as 4:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Margaret White Eagle-Payne
Defendant:
Howard Bemer, Floyd Azure, Stacie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oram v. The Dillon City Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Gary Oram, Jr.
Defendant:
The Dillon City Police Department, Ceth Haggard, Jeremy Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
