Civil Rights Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01657
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Straw v. Dernulc
as 2:2022cv00338
Plaintiff: Karen Straw
Defendant: Timothy Dernulc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HOLLINS et al v. CARDOSI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00141
Plaintiff: DALTON HOLLINS and DYLAN HOLLINS
Defendant: MEGAN CARDOSI, KAREN LINDSEY, HEATHER ARNOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff: JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant: JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SNYDER v. DCS et al
as 1:2022cv01154
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE E. SNYDER
Defendant: DCS, AUBREY JENKINS, SUZANNE CONGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?