Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Chau, et al
as 1:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
Ida Watkins
Defendant:
Stephanie Chau, Christopher Norris, Kevin Collins and others
Harding v. SpaceX et al
as 1:2024cv10977
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
SpaceX and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2024cv10080
Plaintiff:
Sabrina M Williams and Pro se litigant Sabrina M Williams
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Judge Theresa Bisenius, Judge Jennifer Ulwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harding v. Meet Up.com et al
as 1:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Meet Up.com and David Siegel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. Maloney Properties Incorporated
as 1:2024cv10082
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Maloney Properties Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Galarza v. Pimentel et al
as 1:2023cv12881
Plaintiff:
Christina M Galarza
Defendant:
Katrina Pimentel, Kreg Espinola, Joseph L Michaud and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Coucelos et al v. City of Woburn et al
as 1:2023cv12063
Plaintiff:
Jeanny Coucelos and Kevin Coucelos
Defendant:
City of Woburn, Woburn Public Schools, Woburn School Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
