Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Bowman et al v Monteiro et al
as 1:2024cv10850
Plaintiff:
Leo Bowman and Zirahuen Bowman
Defendant:
Sgt Agnaldo P Monteiro, Officer William Hull, Officer Brenden Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brum et al v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv10344
Plaintiff:
Nelson Brum and Leo V Johnson
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office and Paul Heroux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry v. Town of Needham et al
as 1:2021cv11116
Plaintiff:
Marvin Henry
Defendant:
Town of Needham, John Schlittler, Andrew Cray and others
Paulsen v. Great Bridge Attleboro Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2021cv10121
Plaintiff:
Susan Paulsen
Defendant:
Leo Bissonnette, Stewart Property Management and Great Bridge Attleboro Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv30079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wallace et al v. Rooke et al
as 3:2019cv30109
Defendant:
Martin E Germain, City of Springfield, James D Goldrick and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Fennell, Leslie Wallace and Melissa Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz Sr. v. Sorokin
as 1:2019cv10392
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist Ilya Liviz Sr.
Defendant:
Judge Leo T. Sorokin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Howard et al
as 1:2019cv10096
Defendant:
William J. Kayatta, Jeffrey R. Howard, Juan R. Torruella and others
Plaintiff:
Ilya Liviz Jr. and Ilya Liviz Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
