Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Khairullah et. al. v Meyer et. al.
as 3:2023cv30095
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Khairullah, Michael Migliore, Nidal El-Takach and others
Defendant:
Johnathan Meyer, Patrick Lechleitner, Himamauli Das and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morocho et al v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv10652
Plaintiff:
Mario Pillco Morocho, Abdoulaye Fall, Darlin Guillermo and others
Defendant:
Bristol County Sheriff's Office, Thomas M. Hodgson, Mr. Todd Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10278
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
K.O. et al v. Sessions, III et al
as 4:2018cv40149
Defendant:
Alex Azar, John Doe CBP Agents, John Doe ORR Personnel and others
Plaintiff:
C.J., F.C., L.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Redley v. Conely et al
as 1:2017cv10340
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Lloyd Redley
Defendant:
Daniel Conely, Carla Barret, Judge Ernesto and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Andro v. Town of Brookline et al
as 1:2015cv13030
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Andro
Defendant:
Town of Brookline, Daniel C. O'Leary, Michael John McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
