Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Nolan Lanier Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Nolan Lanier Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emke v. Caldwell County, North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
Caldwell County, North Carolina, Caldwell County Sherriff's Office, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emke v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Chad James Emke
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Nolan Lanier Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. N.C. State Dental Board et al
as 5:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Derrick Allen
Defendant:
N.C. State Dental Board, Karen E. Lanier, Better Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LaNier v. LaNier
as 7:2022cv00075
Defendant:
Deborah LaNier and Sharnese LaNier
Plaintiff:
Sharnese T. LaNier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
LaNier v. LaNier
as 7:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Deborah LaNier
Defendant:
Lawrence LaNier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. Lanier Pointe, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Lanier Pointe, LLC, Lanier Pointe Phase II, LLC, Azalea Gardens, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAMPSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01069
Plaintiff:
TAWANA F. SAMPSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MARTY LAWING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
