Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bah v. City of New York
as 18-1853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Oumou Bah, as the administrator of the estate of Mohamed Bah
Defendant:
Police Officers John Does, 1-50 and John Does, 1-10, employees of the City of New York
Defendant - Appellant:
City of New York, Police Officer Vincent Johnson, Individually and in his official capacity, Police Officer Brian Stanton, individually and in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Santina Licitra v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2015cv01188
Defendant:
Michael Canizales, County of Riverside, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Santina Licitra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biton v. New York State General Attorne
as 10-752
Plaintiff:
Charlene Biton
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Crystal Biton, AKA Saphre Redford and Danielle Biton
Defendant - Appellee:
HSBC, AFA-AFL / CIO, UAL Corporation and others
Biton et al v. New York State General Attorney Office et al
as 1:2009cv08604
Plaintiff:
Crystal Biton, Danielle Biton and Charlene Biton
Defendant:
New York State General Attorney Office, Andrew M. Cuomo, New York City District Attorney Office and others
Consolidated Defendant:
AFA-AFL/CIO, UAL Corporation, HSBC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Biton v. IRS et al
as 1:2009cv08605
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Defendant:
IRS, Andrew M. Cuomo, FAA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
