Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TAYLOR-BEY v. INNOVAGE HOLDING CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
ALTHEA TAYLOR-BEY
Defendant:
INNOVAGE HOLDING CORPORATION, TOTAL COMMUNITY OPTIONS GROUP HOLDINGS, INC., INNOVAGE HOLDING CORPORATION PENNSYLVANIA LIFE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00391
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ayala et al v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv00501
Plaintiff:
Adela Ayala and LOA
Defendant:
Richard M. Armstrong and Elke Shaw-Tulloch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loa v. Lynch et al
as 1:2016cv00446
Plaintiff:
Maui Loa
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch and Sally Jewell
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Hou 1778 Hawaiians et al v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Hou 1778 Hawaiians and Maui Loa
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al. v. Wasko, et al.
as 1:2014cv01705
Plaintiff:
Juanita Lopez and Consuelo Romero
Defendant:
Kellie Wasko, David M. Zupan, Randy Lind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Parker County et al
as 4:2014cv00326
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bowen
Defendant:
Parker County , City of Weatherford , City of Mineral Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Amsterdam et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
C. Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam, The Mama Loa Foundation and The Mama Loa Trust
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Colette Machado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
