Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Patti Menders v. Loudoun County School Board
as 22-1168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATTI H. MENDERS, on behalf of herself and her minor child R.M, SCOTT MINEO, on behalf of himself and his minor child A.M and JANE DOE #2, on behalf of herself and her minor child
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE #1, on behalf of herself and her three minor children and JANE DOE #3, on behalf of herself and her minor child
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUDOUN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Menders et al v Loudoun County School Board
as 1:2021cv00669
Plaintiff:
Scott Mineo, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Doe et al v. Beichler et al
as 1:2019cv00646
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and A. A.
Defendant:
Virginia Patterson, Felix Colaciello, Linda Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
