Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cummings et al v. Murillo et al
as 3:2022cv07481
Plaintiff:
Sarah Lee Cummings, Luciano Rosales, Mariena Acosta and others
Defendant:
Sandra Murillo, City Of San Jose, Vanesssa Beretta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. City of San Jose
as 5:2022cv07186
Plaintiff:
Mark Thompson, Rachelle Imus, Jeffrey P. Echivarov and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose, Sandra Murillo, Vanessa Barretta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aviles-Lugo et al v. Ruiz-Feliciano et al
as 3:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Aviles Lugo, Luis A. Aviles Ruiz, Mirna I. Caraballo Dasta and others
Defendant:
Wilfredo Ruiz Feliciano, Norbert Morales Carrero, Maribel Rodriguez Vera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cruz et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv09696
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cruz and Keyon Ashe
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Department (NYPD), Jeffrey Blaustein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toro-McCawn et al v. Quintana-Mendez et al
as 3:2009cv01193
Plaintiff:
Julio Toro-McCawn and Laylanie Ruiz Olmo
Defendant:
Javier Quintana-Mendez, The Solid Waste Authority, Luis Miguel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ruiz-Olmo v. Velez-Arocho et al
as 3:2008cv01638
Plaintiff:
Laylanie Ruiz-Olmo
Defendant:
Javier Velez-Arocho, Javier Quintana-Mendez, Luis Miguel Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramirez v. Potter et al
as 7:2008cv00011
Plaintiff:
Delma Ramirez
Defendant:
John E. Potter, Israel Carrasco, Ismael Hinojos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
