Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MacDonald et al v. South Haven, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Lisa MacDonald and Stephen Ernster
Defendant:
City of South Haven, South Haven, City of and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2023cv10530
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Jacobs
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Rick Snyder, Gretchen Whitmer and others
MacDonald v. City of Detroit et al
as 3:2019cv12183
Defendant:
Detroit Land Bank Authority, Detroit Building Authority and City of Detroit
Plaintiff:
David MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. MacDonald et al
as 2:2016cv13039
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Kathleen MacDonald, Steven Schiller and Dennis Pollard
Wayne County Retirees Association, Inc et al v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2016cv10546
Plaintiff:
Wayne County Retirees Association, Inc , AFSCME Subcharter 38 , Eugene Wright and others
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , Warren Evans , Gary Woronchak and others
Cross_claimant:
Wayne County Employees Retirement System and its Trustees
Cross_defendant:
Warren Evans and Wayne, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. MacDonald (#1180) et al
as 2:2014cv13858
Plaintiff:
Caron Spencer
Defendant:
Craig MacDonald (#1180) and Jack Taeff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin et al v. Dearborn, City of et al
as 2:2014cv11599
Defendant:
Dearborn, City of , Edward Doulette , Chad Macdonald and others
Plaintiff:
Antoinette Austin and Terry Jones Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MacDonald v. Agacinski et al
as 2:2010cv11646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. MacDonald
Defendant:
Robert L. Agacinski, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Attorney Discipline Board and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv12022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
