Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hubbard v. Wallenstein et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Marc A. Wallenstein, William A. Harrison, Leslie E. Osbourne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez et al v. Buchanan et al
as 5:2018cv00136
Defendant:
Marc Kitts, Dennis Anders, Richard Clayton and others
Plaintiff:
Katie Richards, Michelle Sanchez, Casey Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Link v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2014cv00643
Plaintiff:
Brandon Patrick Link
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, Todd A. Adamski, Liberty Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
