Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dallas Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Eric Woodhouse, Fredrick McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Schmidt et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2022cv00404
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Schmidt, Jimmie Lee Jarvis, Kristopher C. Goad and others
Defendant:
City of Richmond, William C. Smith, William Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
August, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Zachary August, Syed Ali, Julea Seliavaski and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, D. Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Equal Pay Act
Lomax v. Rutter Mills Law Firm
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Alvin Maurice Lomax
Defendant:
Rutter Mills Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mills v. City Of Norfolk, Virginia
as 2:2020cv00521
Defendant:
Virginia City Of Norfolk and City of Norfolk, Virginia
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Green v. Mills, et al
as 3:2019cv00906
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Mills, Town of Waverly, Virginia and Derrick Banks
Plaintiff:
Vivian Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
