Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Simpson v. AT&T Mobility et al
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Brenda-Joyce Simpson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, Randel Stephenson and John Stankey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richter v. Mobile Crisis et al
as 3:2022cv00869
Plaintiff:
Jason Richter
Defendant:
Mobile Crisis, Ascension Saint Thomas Hospital Midtown, Middle TN Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Metro By T-Mobile et al
as 2:2022cv02523
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Anderson
Defendant:
Metro By T-Mobile, T-Mobile and its Affiliates and American Arbitration Association
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 2:2019cv02859
Plaintiff:
Madie Brown, Linda Jones, Devin Pigues and others
Defendant:
AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
