Cases 1 - 10 of 579
Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marcus Johnson, Luis Gonzalez, Richard Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024at00689
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Marcus Johnson, Luis Gonzalez, Richard Montes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Billy Gitau v. Dustin Fay et al
as 8:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Billy Gitau
Defendant:
Dustin Fay, Monte Peters, Martha Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnston v. Bradley University Sociology Department et al
as 1:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Bradley University Sociology Department, Library and All Owners, Grounds and Facilities Planning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
