Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mohammad Ahmed v. Charles Gable, IV, et al
as 23-5281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mohammad Mokhtar Ahmed, A Natural Born United States Citizen, Honorable United States Marine, United States Marine Corps Veteran, a Service-Connected United States Veteran
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles H. Gable, IV, Director of the Terrorist Screening Center, Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, Person, Christopher A. Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a Person, in his official capacity, David M. Banning, a Colonel in the United States Marine Corps, in his official capacity; a Person and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Hunt v. President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.'s Administration et al
as 3:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Nathan Charles Hunt
Defendant:
President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.'s Administration, Barack Hussein Obama II's Administration, North American Aerospace Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Haroun Bacchus v. Naval Criminal Investigative Services et al
as 2:2015cv04872
Plaintiff:
Haroun Bacchus
Defendant:
Scott Hall and Naval Criminal Investigative Services
Komatsu v. Naval Criminal Investigative Service
as 1:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Naval Criminal Investigative Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carolyn Martin v. Gerald Martin, et al
as 11-56717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROLYN MARTIN
Defendant:
NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE, MARK D. CLOOKIE, NCIS Director, WADE JACOBSON, NCIS Acting Special Agent in Charge and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GERALD MARTIN, "Jerry," NCIS Special Agent
Martin v. Naval Criminal Investigative Service et al
as 3:2010cv01879
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Martin
Defendant:
Naval Criminal Investigative Service , Mark D. Clookie , Wade Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
